Sometimes back I read in the news about a lion that killed a family and the man poisoned it. This man was being pursued by the police; to persecute him for killing a man eater! An animal that was a threat to many more lives; an animal that had killed his family! I don't know were it all ended, but he was on the run; running from the government that couldn't protect him and his family from a man eater; a government that protects animals from people.
Think about these questions:
1) Did you know that some governments are more passionate at protecting animal rights than human rights?
2) Did you know that some governments would rather make money at the expense of human lives than protect or save human lives at the expense of money?
3) Did you know that many animals on this planet are living more comfortable lives than humans; and this is made by governments that do not care about their people?
Anyway, that is something many of us know. After all, some governments care more about revenging their enemies than providing basic needs for their citizens; and if you've been in the media between 2002 - 2008 then you're my witness.
A government will dish out billions of its currency on an animal research while people die of lack of sufficient medical care! Obviously, knowing such things will stir your anger and you'll wish you where a super man or girl, and you would change the course of events in favor of men and women's lives or livelihood.
Anyway, with in such cases above, it's easy to tell who right and who is in need. But hear comes the case of abortion. Abortion is a very completed matter for many governments to decide on, especially whether it should be legalized or not. Judgments of whether abortion should be legalized or not are very circumstantial. Such questions as;-
1) What if a woman is not ready to conceive?
2) What if she is of a pre-mature age?
3) What is it is out of a crime that she conceived, say rape or defilement?
4) What is the father is irresponsible or even denies?
5) What if the father is incapable of sustaining the pregnancy?
6) And, the funny one of all, what if the man doesn't simply want the baby?
7) Lastly, what if one of the parents if insane or a premature?
Should the government legalize abortion in such cases or not? What standards or measures should be taken to prove that the permitted abortion case lays under the above instances? When I look at such cases, I then ask my self whether there are any exeptions or not since to me, it seems abortion can have been fully legalized since almost all cases lay somewhere in one or more cases above.
Should the government protect the babies from such a preventive or murderous practice? I personally think the government should also give some protection to these young people-to-be especially in cases where the mother is fully grown and health-wise capable of giving birth. Religious beliefs may not be just here if considered (since many of them are extreme...) while taking such decisions; it's very true.
Think about these questions:
1) Did you know that some governments are more passionate at protecting animal rights than human rights?
2) Did you know that some governments would rather make money at the expense of human lives than protect or save human lives at the expense of money?
3) Did you know that many animals on this planet are living more comfortable lives than humans; and this is made by governments that do not care about their people?
Anyway, that is something many of us know. After all, some governments care more about revenging their enemies than providing basic needs for their citizens; and if you've been in the media between 2002 - 2008 then you're my witness.
A government will dish out billions of its currency on an animal research while people die of lack of sufficient medical care! Obviously, knowing such things will stir your anger and you'll wish you where a super man or girl, and you would change the course of events in favor of men and women's lives or livelihood.
Anyway, with in such cases above, it's easy to tell who right and who is in need. But hear comes the case of abortion. Abortion is a very completed matter for many governments to decide on, especially whether it should be legalized or not. Judgments of whether abortion should be legalized or not are very circumstantial. Such questions as;-
1) What if a woman is not ready to conceive?
2) What if she is of a pre-mature age?
3) What is it is out of a crime that she conceived, say rape or defilement?
4) What is the father is irresponsible or even denies?
5) What if the father is incapable of sustaining the pregnancy?
6) And, the funny one of all, what if the man doesn't simply want the baby?
7) Lastly, what if one of the parents if insane or a premature?
Should the government legalize abortion in such cases or not? What standards or measures should be taken to prove that the permitted abortion case lays under the above instances? When I look at such cases, I then ask my self whether there are any exeptions or not since to me, it seems abortion can have been fully legalized since almost all cases lay somewhere in one or more cases above.
Should the government protect the babies from such a preventive or murderous practice? I personally think the government should also give some protection to these young people-to-be especially in cases where the mother is fully grown and health-wise capable of giving birth. Religious beliefs may not be just here if considered (since many of them are extreme...) while taking such decisions; it's very true.
